Monday, April 21

Gender

As a woman, I wanted to be on Hillary’s side throughout this campaign, but she constantly turns me off because she seems to be playing a game. Hillary strikes as a politician, the kind of politician who says all the right things, who puts down their opponent and focuses on their minor flaws and mistakes. I wish that Hillary would stop playing this game and be more real with people. I think in some ways Hillary is trying to compensate for her gender. She might feel that she needs to be as hard, detached, and strong as a male candidate or that she must play the men’s game in order to beat them. I just think she would do a lot better and win more support if she would just be herself: an intelligent, confident, capable, and articulate WOMAN.

3 comments:

MT said...

this post would be strengthened by examples of the put downs and focus on the minor flaws? otherwise it might come off too much like an accusation without substance which cannot be disputed. If you want to make that point, make it well.

Maybe Hillary didn't just "feel" that she needed to be as "hard, detached, and strong" as a male candidate to beat them - maybe she did need to compensate in that direction.

If you like Alicia Keys, watch this video. Post again then about the "harshness" that you see in Hillary. COPY - PASTE -- >
http://youtube.com/watch?v=RgLAn5a_Kcc <-- COPY PASTE

thefuzz said...

I heard that 6 out of 10 voters in Pennsylvania do not think that Hillary is trustworthy. You should read the blog entitled "The Debate of Character."

Trust is a real important characteristic that any politican should display. And i think people should keep their eyes open and pay close attention to the future President character.

TRUTH HURTS said...

What games are she playing exactly? How has she not appeared strong, intelligent, etc.? Im just curious as to exactly what you are referring to. Oh and why are those qualities (hard and strong) only reserved for males?